Infection After Lower-Limb Osseointegration: A Single-Center Retrospective Evaluation of Pathogens, Management, and Outcomes.

PURPOSE: Osseointegration (OI) is a novel alternative to traditional socket-suspended prostheses for lower-limb amputees, eliminating the socket-skin interface and allowing for weight bearing directly on the skeletal system. However, the stoma through which the implant attaches to the external prosthesis creates an ingress route for bacteria, and infection rates as high as 66% have been reported. The aims of this study are to classify infection management and long-term outcomes in this patient population to maximize implant salvage. METHODS: An institutional review board-approved retrospective analysis was performed on all patients who underwent lower-limb OI at our institution between 2017 and 2022. Demographic, operative, and outcome data were collected for all patients. Patients were stratified by the presence and severity of infection. Chi-square and t tests were performed on categorical and continuous data, respectively, using an alpha of 0.05. RESULTS: One hundred two patients met our study criteria; 62 had transfemoral OI and 40 had transtibial OI. Patients were followed for 23.8 months on average (range, 3.5-63.7). Osteomyelitis was more likely than soft tissue infection to be polymicrobial in nature (71% vs 23%, P < 0.05). Infections at the stoma were mostly (96%) managed with oral antibiotics alone, whereas deeper soft tissue infections also required intravenous antibiotics (75%) or operative washout (19%). Osteomyelitis was managed with intravenous antibiotics and required operative attention; 5 (71%) underwent washout and 2 (29%) underwent explantation. Both implants were replaced an average of 3.5 months after explantation. There was no correlation between history of soft tissue infection and development of osteomyelitis (P > 0.05). The overall implant salvage rate after infection was 96%. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes our institution's experience managing infection after OI and soft tissue reconstruction. Although infections do occur, they are easily treatable and rarely require operative intervention. Explantation due to infection is rare and can be followed up with reimplantation, reaffirming that OI is a safe and effective treatment modality.

Constructing an Osseointegrated Prosthetic Leg.

Background: Constructing an osseointegrated prosthetic leg is the necessary subsequent phase of care for patients following the surgical implantation of an osseointegrated prosthetic limb anchor. The surgeon implants the bone-anchored transcutaneous implant1,2 and the prosthetist constructs the prosthetic leg, which then attaches to the surgically implanted anchor. An osseointegration surgical procedure is usually considered in patients who are unable to use or are dissatisfied with the use of a socket prosthesis. Description: This present video article describes the techniques and principles involved in constructing a prosthetic leg for transfemoral and transtibial amputees, as well as postoperative patient care. Preoperatively, as part of a multidisciplinary team approach, the prosthetist should assist in patient evaluation to determine suitability for osseointegration surgery. Postoperatively, when approved by the surgeon, the first step is to perform an implant inspection and to take patient measurements. A temporary loading implant is provided to allow the patient to start loading the limb. When the patient is approved for full-length leg to begin full weight-bearing, the implant and prosthetic quality are evaluated, including torque, implant position, bench alignment, static alignment in the standing position, and initial dynamic alignment. This surgical procedure also requires long-term, continued patient care and prosthetic maintenance. Alternatives: For patients who are dissatisfied with the use of a socket prosthesis, adjustments can often be made to improve the comfort, fit, and performance of the prosthesis. Non-osseointegration surgical options include bone lengthening and/or soft-tissue contouring. Rationale: Osseointegration can be provided for amputees who are expressing dissatisfaction with their socket prosthesis, and typically provides superior mobility and quality of life compared with nonoperative and other operative options3,4. Specific differences between the appropriate design and construction of osseointegrated prostheses versus socket prostheses include component selection, component fit, patient-prosthesis static and dynamic alignment, tolerances and accommodations, and also the expected long-term changes in patient joint mobility and behavior. Providing an osseointegrated prosthesis according to the principles appropriate for socket prostheses may often leave an osseointegrated patient improperly aligned and provoke maladaptive accommodations, hindering performance and potentially putting patients at unnecessary risk for injury. Expected Outcomes: Review articles describing the clinical outcomes of osseointegration consistently suggest that patients with osseointegrated prostheses have improved prosthesis wear time, mobility, and quality of life compared with patients with socket prostheses. Importantly, studies have shown that osseointegrated prostheses can be utilized in patients with short residual limbs that preclude the use of a socket prosthesis, allowing them to regain or retain function of the joint proximal to the short residuum5,6. Osseoperception improves patient confidence during mobility7. Because there is an open skin portal, low-grade soft-tissue infection can occur, which is usually treated with a short course of oral antibiotics. Much less often, soft-tissue debridement or implant removal may be needed to treat infection8. Periprosthetic fractures can nearly always be treated with familiar fracture fixation techniques and implant retention9,10. Important Tips: Falls can lead to periprosthetic fractures.Malalignment can lead to unnecessary pathologic joint forces, soft-tissue contractures, and an accommodative gait.Inadequately sophisticated components can leave patients at a performance deficit.Wearing the prosthetic leg while sleeping may lead to rotational forces exerted on the limb, which may cause prolonged tension on the soft tissue. Acronyms and Abbreviations: QTFA = Questionnaire for Persons with a Transfemoral AmputationLD-SRS = Limb Deformity Modified Scoliosis Research SocietyPROMIS = Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information SystemEQ-5D = EuroQol 5 Dimensions.

Horrifying Basal Cell Carcinoma Presenting as Progressive Pyoderma Gangrenosum: Case Report.

Introduction: Skin ulcers can be challenging to diagnose and manage, particularly with comorbid autoimmune and gastrointestinal diseases. Occam's razor encourages the simplest explanation to guide care, but reconsideration must occur when intervention proves futile. Case Presentation: We report the case of a 70-year-old male, with a 17-year history of expanding pretibial skin ulcer, presumed by prior care providers to be pyoderma gangrenosum related to Crohn's disease. A surgical biopsy performed upon presentation to our institution revealed basal cell carcinoma of the skin, invasive to the proximal tibia with associated deep infection, prompting transfemoral amputation. Conclusion: This report is written as a reminder to reconsider a diagnosis and consider seeking additional expertise when a patient's condition progressively worsens despite intervention. Earlier diagnosis likely would have facilitated therapeutic limb salvage care.

Distal Femoral Osteotomy for the Management of Coronal Deformity Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Report of 2 Cases.

CASE: We present 2 cases demonstrating the management of coronal malalignment with an existing total knee arthroplasty using opening wedge distal femur osteotomy. The mechanical axis was corrected, and the primary total knee implants were maintained. Patients resumed full activity 3 to 4 months after surgery. CONCLUSION: In certain cases, opening wedge distal femoral osteotomy is an option to correct coronal malalignment with an existing total knee arthroplasty without revising the implant.

Staged Extra-Articular Deformity Correction in the Setting of Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Background: Extra-articular lower-leg deformities mandate unique considerations when planning total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Poor limb alignment may increase perioperative complications and cause early implant failure. This study reports on the safety and efficacy of staged, extra-articular deformity correction about the knee in the setting of osteoarthritis and TKA. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted from December 2007 to December 2019 identifying 30 deformities in 27 patients (average age: 52.7 years; range 31-74) who underwent staged surgical correction of extra-articular deformity in preparation for TKA. Patient demographics, surgical details, clinical and radiographic measurements, severity of knee arthritis, and complications were collected. Results: There were 17 femur and 12 tibia deformities. There was an average improvement of 14.7° of deformity measured in the coronal plane and 12.7° of deformity in the sagittal plane in the femur and 13.5° in the coronal plane and 10.3° in the sagittal plane in the tibia. Leg length discrepancies improved by 26 mm on average (1-100 mm). After an average 3.1-year follow-up, 12 out of 27 patients proceeded with primary or revision TKA. There were no cases of blood transfusion, nerve palsy, or compartment syndrome, and all patients achieved bony union. Conclusions: Staged, extra-articular deformity correction is a safe and effective approach to improve limb alignment in the setting of knee osteoarthritis and TKA.

Precice Stryde® Magnetic Internal Lengthening Nail does not Impair Bone Healing Despite Radiographic and Clinical Symptoms.

Aims: The Precice Stryde® internal magnetic lengthening nail allowed many patients a full weight-bearing experience during femur and tibia lengthening, but concerns over corrosion, pain and radiographic changes led to the implant's recall. Despite the recall, it is important to understand the rate of these occurrences and their influence on the overall success of the lengthening procedure. We aimed to investigate radiographic changes, patient-reported symptoms and bone healing indices for our cohort of Stryde lengthening. Materials and methods: Our surgical database and electronic medical record system were used to review and document patient demographics, indications for lengthening, length achieved, bone healing index (BHI), location and type of radiographic changes, time until radiographic changes were first visible, presence of pain symptoms (not attributable to surgery or distraction), time to implant removal and if the pain symptoms resolved following implant extraction. Results: From January 2019 to February 2021, 90 Stryde nails (78 femur and 12 tibia) were implanted in 63 patients. The cohort included 48 males and 15 females. The average length [± standard deviation (SD)] achieved was 58.4 ± 22.7 mm. The 66 bones (73%) developed radiographic changes and were found to be 58/78 (74%) femurs and 8/12 (67%) tibias. The average time to initial radiographic changes was 168 ± 108.1 days (femur) and 276 ± 126.8 days (tibia). Late-onset pain developed in 10 femur lengthening (11.1% of all nails) surgeries across eight patients (12.7% of all patients). All patients' pain resolved; three instances prior to nail removal and the remaining seven after nail removal. No patients were re-presented with worsening pain or radiographic changes following implant removal. Radiographic or symptomatic abnormalities did not impair bone formation. The BHI for femurs with (29.6 ± 16.6 days/cm, n = 58) vs without (29.4 ± 17.9 days/cm, n = 20) radiographic or symptomatic irregularity were nearly identical (p = 0.961). The difference between BHI for tibias with (39.3 ± 7.8 days/cm, n = 8) vs without (86.1 ± 38.2 days/cm, n = 4) radiographic changes was influenced by outliers and underpowered to draw a conclusion. Conclusion: Bone lengthening with the Stryde nail was associated with high rates of radiographic abnormalities, but symptoms were uncommon and resolved with explantation. The radiographic changes did not affect bone healing in the femur. Clinical significance: Radiographic changes including bone hypertrophy and osteolysis were common after bone lengthening with the Stryde nail, but the development of pain following consolidation was rare and resolved with implant removal.The BHI in femurs was not affected by radiographic changes. How to cite this article: Reif TJ, Geffner A, Hoellwarth JS, et al. Precice Stryde® Magnetic Internal Lengthening Nail does not Impair Bone Healing Despite Radiographic and Clinical Symptoms. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2023;18(2):94-99.

Avoiding Compartment Syndrome, Vascular Injury, and Neurologic Deficit in Tibial Osteotomy: An Observational Study of 108 Limbs.

INTRODUCTION: Tibial deformities are common, but substantial concern may be associated with corrective osteotomy regarding major complications reported in classic literature. Such studies chiefly focused on high tibial osteotomy, with relatively little investigation of other areas and types of deformity. The primary aim of this study was to identify the rate of compartment syndrome, vascular injury, nerve injury, and other major complications after elective tibial osteotomy. METHODS: One hundred eight tibia osteotomies performed during 2019 to 2021 were evaluated, representing all tibia osteotomies except situations of existing infection. A retrospective chart review was performed to identify patient demographics, surgical indications, anatomic location of osteotomy, fixation used, and complications prompting additional surgery. RESULTS: The most common osteotomy locations were high tibial osteotomy (35/108 = 32%, 32/35 = 91% medial opening, and 3/35 = 9% medial closing), proximal metaphysis (30/108 = 28%), and diaphysis (32/108 = 30%). The most common fixation was plate and screw (38/108 = 35%) or dynamic frame (36/108 = 33%). Tranexamic acid was administered to 107/108 = 99% of patients and aspirin chemoprophylaxis was used for 83/108 = 86%. A total of 33/34= 97% of anterior compartment prophylactic fasciotomies were performed for diaphyseal or proximal metaphysis osteotomies. No events of compartment syndrome, vascular injury, nerve injury, or pulmonary embolism occurred. One patient required débridement to address infection. Additional surgery for delayed/nonunion occurred for nine segments (8%). Additional surgery for other reasons were performed for 10 segments (9%), none resulting in reduced limb function. CONCLUSION: Tibial osteotomy can be safely performed for a variety of indications in a diverse range of patients, without a notable risk of the most feared complications of compartment syndrome, vascular injury, and neurologic deficit. Prophylactic fasciotomy and reducing postoperative bleeding using tranexamic acid, along with location-specific safe surgical techniques, may help prevent major complications and thereby facilitate optimized deformity care.

Comparative fixation devices for preventing migration of the proximal tibiofibular joint during tibial lengthening: a tether versus screw fixation.

BACKGROUND: When lengthening the tibia segment using motorized internal lengthening nails (MILN), undesired distal migration of the proximal fibula segment is prevented by tibiofibular stabilization, traditionally using a screw. A tightened cortical suspensory fixation rope (tether) is an alternative option, but its appropriateness has never been studied. The primary outcome was comparing the amount of proximal fibular migration between patients who were stabilized with either a tether or a screw. The secondary outcome was to evaluate the effect of fibular migration on the clinical outcome between both groups. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent tibial lengthening with MILN between April 2016 and June 2022. Two cohorts were compared: 18 limbs with tether fixation versus 29 limbs with screw fixation. Data on the patient's age, sex, etiologies, and clinical outcomes were collected. Radiographic measurements included the lengthening distance and the amount of proximal fibular migration. RESULTS: In total, 47 limbs from 41 patients, with average age 35.01 ± 13.72 years old. There were 28 males (68.29%) and 13 females (31.71%). The tether group demonstrated a statistically significant greater distance of migration than the screw group (p < 0.001), with an average migration distance of 8.39 ± 5.09 mm and 2.59 ± 3.06 mm, respectively. No correlation was found between the amount of tibial lengthening and the distance of proximal fibular migration in both the tether group (p = 0.96) and the screw group (p = 0.32). There was no significant difference in the change of knee extension between both groups (p = 0.3), and no patients reported knee pain or tightness. CONCLUSION: A screw provides better resistance to proximal tibiofibular joint migration during MILN lengthening, but the difference appears clinically inconsequential. Either option appears suitable.

Osseointegration for Lower Limb Amputation: Understanding the Risk Factors and Time Courses of Soft Tissue Complications.

PURPOSE: Lower-limb osseointegrated prostheses are a novel alternative to traditional socket-suspended prostheses, which are often associated with poor fit, soft tissue damage, and pain. Osseointegration eliminates the socket-skin interface and allows for weight-bearing directly on the skeletal system. However, these prostheses can also be complicated by postoperative issues that can negatively impact mobility and quality of life. Little is known about the incidence of or risk factors for these complications as few centers currently perform the procedure. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on all patients who underwent single-stage lower limb osseointegration at our institution between 2017 and 2021. Patient demographics, medical history, operative data, and outcomes were collected. Fisher exact test and unpaired t tests were performed to identify risk factors for each adverse outcome, and time-to-event survival curves were generated. RESULTS: Sixty patients met our study criteria: 42 males and 18 females with 35 transfemoral and 25 transtibial amputations. The cohort had an average age of 48 years (range, 25-70 years) and follow-up period of 22 months (range, 6-47 months). Indications for amputation were trauma (50), prior surgical complication (5), cancer (4), and infection (1). Postoperatively, 25 patients developed soft tissue infections, 5 developed osteomyelitis, 6 had symptomatic neuromas, and 7 required soft tissue revisions. Soft tissue infections were positively correlated with obesity and female sex. Neuroma development was associated with increased age at osseointegration. Neuromas and osteomyelitis were both associated with decreased center experience. Subgroup analysis by amputation etiology and anatomic location did not show significant differences in outcomes. Notably, hypertension (15), tobacco use (27), and prior site infection (23) did not correlate with worse outcomes. Forty-seven percent of soft tissue infections occurred in the 1 month after implantation, and 76% occurred in the first 4 months. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide preliminary insights into risk factors for postoperative complications arising from lower limb osseointegration. These factors are both modifiable (body mass index, center experience), and unmodifiable (sex, age). As this procedure continues to expand in popularity, such results are necessary to inform best practice guidelines and optimize outcomes. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm the above trends.

Osseointegration for Lower-Extremity Amputees: Operative Considerations from the Plastic Surgeon's Perspective.

➢: Osseointegration for lower-extremity amputees, while increasing in frequency, remains in its relative infancy compared with traditional socket-based prostheses. ➢: Ideal candidates for osseointegration have documented failure of a traditional prosthesis and should be skeletally mature, have adequate bone stock, demonstrate an ability to adhere to a longitudinal rehabilitation protocol, and be in an otherwise good state of health. ➢: Lowering the reoperation rate for soft-tissue complications depends heavily on surgical technique and on the implant device itself; the current gold standard involves a smooth implant surface for dermal contact as well as maximal skin resection to prevent skin breakdown against the prosthesis. This may include the need for thighplasty to optimize skin reduction. ➢: Interdisciplinary peripheral nerve management, such as targeted muscle reinnervation, performed in tandem with a plastic surgery team can treat existing and prevent future symptomatic neuromas, ultimately improving pain outcomes.

Unexpected positive intraoperative cultures (UPIC) at index osseointegration do not lead to increased postoperative infectious events.

Introduction: The most common complication following transcutaneous osseointegration for amputees is infection. Although an obvious source of contamination is the permanent stoma, operative site contamination at the time of implantation may be an additional source. This study investigates the impact of unexpected positive intraoperative cultures (UPIC) on postoperative infection. Methods: Charts were reviewed for 8 patients with UPIC and 22 patients with negative intraoperative cultures (NIC) who had at least 1 year of post-osseointegration follow-up. All patients had 24 h of routine postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis, with UPIC receiving additional antibiotics guided by culture results. The main outcome measure was postoperative infection intervention, which was graded as (0) none, (1) antibiotics unrelated to the initial surgery, (2) operative debridement with implant retention, or (3) implant removal. Results: The UPIC vs. NIC rate of infection management was as follows: Grade 0, 6/8 = 75 % vs. 14/22 = 64 %, p = 0.682; Grade 1, 2/8 = 25 % vs. 8/22 = 36.4 % (Fisher's p = 0.682); Grade 2, 1/8 = 12.5 % vs. 0/22 = 0 % (Fisher's p = 0.267); Grade 3, 0/8 = 0 % vs. 1/22 = 4.5 % (Fisher's p = 1.000). No differences were statistically significant. Conclusions: UPIC at index osseointegration, managed with directed postoperative antibiotics, does not appear to increase the risk of additional infection management. The therapeutic benefit of providing additional directed antibiotics versus no additional antibiotics following UPIC is unknown and did not appear to increase the risk of other adverse outcomes in our cohort.

Prophylaxis and treatment of infection in long bones using an antibiotic-loaded ceramic coating with interlocking intramedullary nails.

Background: The study was done (1) to report on our recent experience with antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate-coated interlocking intramedullary nails (CS-IMN) for infection prevention or infection eradication and (2) to compare the efficacy of CS-IMN versus antibiotic-loaded polymethylmethacrylate-coated IMN (PMMA-IMN) for infection eradication. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of consecutive patients who underwent a limb salvage procedure for infection cure or infection prevention with PMMA-IMN or CS-IMN. We reviewed patient demographics, host-type, pre-operative infecting organisms, intraoperative cultures, as well as our main outcomes: infection control rate, achievement of union/fusion, and limb salvage. Results: 33 patients were treated with CS-IMN: 9 patients with goal of infection cure and 24 patients for infection prophylaxis. When used for infection prophylaxis, there was a 100 % ( 24 / 24 patients) prevention of infection rate, 95.5 % union rate ( 21 / 22 patients), and 100 % ( 24 / 24  patients) limb salvage rate. Nine patients were treated with CS-IMN to eradicate infection and were compared to a cohort of 28 patients who were treated with PMMA-IMN. The infection was eradicated in 7 / 9 patients (77.8 %) in the CS-IMN group versus 21/26 patients (80 %) in the PMMA-IMN group ( p = 0.44 ). Bone union/fusion was achieved in 8 / 9 patients (88.9 %) in the CS-IMN group versus 21/24 patients (87.5 %) in the PMMA-IMN group ( p = 0.11 ). The limb salvage rate in the CS-IMN group was 100 % ( 9 / 9  patients) versus 89 % ( 25 / 28  patients) in the PMMA-IMN group. Conclusions: CS-IMN are safe and easy to use, and we have therefore expended our indications for them. CS-IMN are very effective at infection prophylaxis in high-risk cases where infection is suspected. Early analysis suggests that CS-IMN are non-inferior to PMMA-IMN for infection eradication. This is our preliminary data that show this novel technique to be safe in a small cohort and may be as effective as the more established method. Future studies with larger cohorts of patients will be required to confirm these findings.

Revision Amputation with Press-Fit Osseointegration for Transfemoral Amputees.

Press-fit transfemoral osseointegration is the technique of inserting an intramedullary metal implant into the residual femur of an amputee; the implant is passed transcutaneously to attach to a standard prosthesis that includes a knee, tibia, ankle, and foot. This allows the prosthesis to be skeletally anchored, eliminating socket-related problems such as tissue compression that can provoke neurogenic pain, skin abrasion, and fitting problems resulting from residual limb size fluctuation1. Amputees with osseointegrated prostheses typically wear their prosthesis more and experience better mobility, quality of life, and extremity proprioception compared to those with socket prostheses2-4. Description: We demonstrate the fundamentals of a single-stage procedure involving an impacted press-fit porous-coated titanium osseointegration implant. The preoperative evaluation is summarized and the specific surgical steps are described: exposure, osteotomy, canal preparation, implant insertion, (optional) targeted muscle reinnervation, muscle closure, soft-tissue contouring and stoma creation, and abutment insertion. Alternatives: Amputees who are dissatisfied with their quality of life or mobility when using a socket prosthesis can attempt to modify their socket or activity level or accept their situation. Non-osseointegration surgical options to try to improve socket fit include bone lengthening and/or soft-tissue contouring. An alternative design is a screw-type osseointegration implant1. Rationale: Press-fit osseointegration can be provided for amputees having difficulty with socket wear5. Press-fit osseointegration usually provides superior mobility and quality of life compared with nonoperative and other operative options for patients expressing dissatisfaction for reasons such as those mentioned above, including poor fit, compromised energy transfer, skin pinching, compression, and abrasions. Expected Outcomes: Review articles describing the clinical outcomes of osseointegration consistently suggest that patients have improved prosthesis wear time, mobility, and quality of life compared with patients with a socket prosthesis3,4. In a recent study2 of 18 femoral and 13 tibial amputees who had osseointegration, Reif et al. showed significant improvements in prosthesis wear time, mobility, and multiple quality-of-life surveys at a mean follow-up of nearly 2 years. The most common postoperative complication for this procedure is low-grade soft-tissue infection, which is usually managed by a short course of oral antibiotics. Much less often, soft-tissue debridement or implant removal may be needed to manage infection. Periprosthetic fractures can nearly always be managed with familiar fracture fixation techniques and implant retention6. Important Tips: Template and choose an implant with an optimal diameter that encroaches the inner cortex at the narrowest bone diameter; an implant that is too wide may not fit without causing a large fracture, and an implant that is too narrow may fall out. Do not cement the implant7.Ideally, the abutment of the implant should rest against a flat transverse bone end with cortical contact and leave the correct amount of room for the prosthetic knee so that it matches the height of the contralateral knee; avoid inserting an implant too distally or in too wide a metaphyseal flare.Gentle impaction pressure is necessary and small contained distal fractures are acceptable, but avoid causing a propagating fracture. Do not place cerclage cables or loose bone graft at these small fracture sites.Avoid the use of a tourniquet during intramedullary reaming to prevent potential heat-induced osteonecrosis.Nerve surgery such as targeted muscle reinnervation, if indicated, can be performed in the same surgical episode as the osseointegration.The muscles should be closed at the bone-implant interface with use of a tight purse string in order to provide a vascularized tissue barrier against bacterial ingress8.The skin surrounding the stoma should have unnecessary fat removed, but not excess removal leading to skin necrosis. The skin fascia should be sutured to the muscle surrounding the stoma to stabilize the peri-stomal skin.Soft-tissue contouring is needed to achieve the optimal soft-tissue tension around the stoma and abutment. Single-stage surgery has a distinct advantage in this regard. Acronyms and Abbreviations: MVA = motor vehicle accidentAP = anteroposteriorCT = computed tomographyTMR = targeted muscle reinnervationQTFA = Questionnaire for Persons with a Transfemoral AmputationEQ-5D = EuroQol 5 DimensionsLD-SRS = Limb Deformity-Scoliosis Research Society (questionnaire)PROMIS = Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System.

Local Infiltrative Analgesia is Equivalent to Fascia Iliaca Block for Perioperative Pain Management for Prophylactic Cephalomedullary Nail Fixation.

Background: Impending pathologic fractures of the femur due to metastatic bone disease are treated with prophylactic internal fixation to prevent fracture, maintain independence, and improve quality of life. There is limited data to support an optimal perioperative pain regimen. Methods: A proof of concept comparative cohort analysis was performed: 21 patients who received a preoperative fascia iliacus nerve block (FIB) were analyzed retrospectively while 9 patients treated with local infiltrative analgesia (LIA) were analyzed prospectively. Primary outcomes included: visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, narcotic requirements and hospital length of stay. Patient cohorts were compared via two-sample t-tests and Fischer's exact tests. Differences in VAS pain scores, length of stay and morphine milligram equivalents (MME) were assessed with Wilcoxon rank sum. Results: The LIA group had more patients treated with preoperative narcotics (p=0.042). There were no significant differences between the FIB and LIA groups in MME utilized intraoperatively (30.0 vs 37.5, p=0.79), on POD 0 (38.0 vs 30.0, p=0.93), POD 1 (46.0 vs 55.5, p=0.95) or POD 2 (40.0 vs 60.0 p=0.73). There were no significant differences in analog pain scale at any time point or in hospital length of stay (78 vs 102 hours, p=0.86). Conclusion: Despite an increased number of patients being on preoperative narcotics in the LIA group, use of LIA compared with FIB is not associated with an increase in VAS pain scores, morphine milligram equivalents (MME), or length of hospital stay in patients undergoing prophylactic internal fixation of impending pathologic femur fractures.Level of Evidence: III.

Attachment of a Myoelectric Prosthesis After Transulnar Osseointegration Implantation: A 2-Patient Case Study.

CASE: This report discusses 2 successful cases of traumatic transulnar amputees who underwent osseointegration implantation. After surgery, a myoelectric prosthetic equipped with Coapt (Chicago, IL) recognition software was attached directly to the implant. Patients underwent training with pattern recognition software to learn to control the myoelectric prosthetic with the multiarticulating hand and wrist. Both implants osseointegrated without signs of loosening at the most recent follow-up of 18 months and 2 years, respectively. Prosthetic control gradually improved to allow activities of daily living. CONCLUSION: These cases demonstrate what can be achieved with interdisciplinary coordination between surgeons, prosthetists, and emerging technologies.

Early Experience with Femoral and Tibial Bone-Anchored Osseointegration Prostheses.

BACKGROUND: The use of bone-anchored osseointegration implants for amputation reconstruction continues to expand throughout the world. Benefits are thought to include the elimination of socket-related problems and improved control and proprioception of the prosthetic limb. Reported outcomes have been positive, but skepticism remains with regard to the risk of infection and implant failure. Further results from early adopters are therefore needed prior to widespread acceptance and regulatory approval. METHODS: A retrospective review of the first 31 consecutive patients who underwent implantation of a press-fit osseointegration implant of the femur or tibia with follow-up of at least 6 months was performed. The primary outcome was the patient-reported Questionnaire for persons with a Transfemoral Amputation (Q-TFA) measured preoperatively and 6 to 12 months postoperatively. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and Limb Deformity-Scoliosis Research Society (LD-SRS) scores, 2-minute and 6-minute walk tests, and complications were also recorded. RESULTS: In this study, 18 femoral reconstructions and 13 tibial reconstructions were performed, with a mean follow-up (and standard deviation) of 21.1 ± 9.2 months. Twenty-eight reconstructions were single-stage implantations. All Q-TFA domains improved significantly (p < 0.001) from preoperatively to postoperatively, including the global score (25.0 ± 17.4 to 81.2 ± 17.6 points), prosthetic use (50.2 ± 39.9 to 91.2 ± 18.7 points), prosthetic mobility (49.7 ± 26.9 to 81.4 ± 21.5 points), and prosthetic problems (46.4 ± 17.5 to 9.1 ± 6.6 points). The overall and functional outcome domains of the PROMIS and LD-SRS and the 2-minute walk test (243 ± 107 to 369 ± 151 ft [74 ± 33 to 112 ± 46 m]; p = 0.022) and 6-minute walk test (609 ± 323 to 1,054 ± 555 ft [186 ± 98 to 321 ± 169 m]; p = 0.016) also improved significantly. Serious adverse events included 2 periprosthetic hip fractures, 1 explantation for septic loosening, and 1 explantation for aseptic loosening, with an overall implant retention of 93%. The most common complication was low-grade, soft-tissue infection requiring oral antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: Similar to the early experience of other international centers, osseointegration implants improved the overall and functional experience of patients compared with socket prosthetics. Complications were present but manageable and were not a deterrent to ongoing support of the technology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Limb Length Discrepancy and Angular Deformity due to Benign Bone Tumors and Tumor-like Lesions.

Benign bone tumors and tumor-like lesions are frequently diagnosed in children and adolescents. The immature skeleton is at risk for growth disturbances and deformity because of the effects of the lesions on normal bone architecture and the physis. The development, manifestation, and severity of the limb length inequality and deformity differs between the various bone pathologies. Distraction osteogenesis, osteotomy, and guided growth are key tools in the treatment of limb inequality and deformity using a combination of external and internal fixation devices.

Alcohol-induced Wnt signaling inhibition during bone fracture healing is normalized by intermittent parathyroid hormone treatment.

Nearly half of orthopaedic trauma patients are intoxicated at the time of injury, and excess alcohol consumption increases the risk for fracture nonunion. Previous studies show alcohol disrupts fracture associated Wnt signaling required for normal bone fracture repair. Intermittent parathyroid hormone (PTH) promotes bone growth through canonical Wnt signaling, however, no studies have investigated the effect of PTH on alcohol-inhibited bone fracture repair. Male C57BL/6 mice received two-3 day alcohol binges separated by 4 days before receiving a mid-shaft tibia fracture. Postoperatively, mice received PTH daily until euthanasia. Wnt/ß-catenin signaling was analyzed at 9 days post-fracture. As previously observed, acute alcohol exposure resulted in a >2-fold decrease in total and the active form of ß-catenin and a 2-fold increase in inactive ß-catenin within the fracture callus. Intermittent PTH abrogated the effect of alcohol on ß-catenin within the fracture callus. Upstream of ß-catenin, alcohol-treated animals had a 2-fold decrease in total LRP6, the Wnt co-receptor, which was restored with PTH treatment. Alcohol nor PTH had any significant effect on GSK-3ß. These data show that intermittent PTH following a tibia fracture restores normal expression of Wnt signaling proteins within the fracture callus of alcohol-treated mice.

A retrospective review of revision proximal humeral allograft-prosthetic composite procedures: an analysis of proximal humeral bone stock restoration.

BACKGROUND: Allograft-prosthetic composite (APC) reconstruction of the proximal humerus is a technique for reconstruction of large bone deficits, provides improvement in pain and function, and is thought to restore bone if revision surgery is needed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of proximal humeral APCs to restore usable bone at the time of revision surgery. METHODS: Two institutional electronic medical records were reviewed to evaluate proximal humeral APC procedures performed between 1970 and 2018. We identified 115 cases, of which 14 underwent revision for aseptic causes. The indications for revision included nonunion (n = 7), glenohumeral instability (n = 5), and allograft fracture (n = 2). Three categories were used to classify the amount of usable allograft retained at revision surgery: type A, complete allograft retention; type B, partial retention; and type C, no retention. RESULTS: A total of 14 patients (6 male and 8 female patients) underwent revision of the APC reconstruction at a mean of 22.8 months. At revision, allograft retention was classified as type A in 6 shoulders, type B in 3, and type C in 5. Type A cases were associated with nonunion with a well-fixed stem, type B cases were associated with instability and were converted from a hemiarthroplasty to a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, and type C cases were associated with an allograft fracture or nonunion with a loose humeral component. CONCLUSION: A substantial number of revisions of proximal humeral APC reconstructions maintain a portion of the allograft bone (64.3%). This study supports the ongoing use of the APC reconstruction technique for large bone deficits.

No consensus on implant choice for oligometastatic disease of the femoral head and neck.

OBJECTIVES: Metastatic disease involving the femoral head and neck is often treated with a hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty (THA) to prevent pathologic fracture but there are no outcome studies demonstrating superiority of one option over the other. METHODS: This investigation was designed as a survey of the current members of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS). The survey contained seven clinical vignettes with identical imaging of a pathologic lesion of the femoral head and neck. The primary outcome measured was decision to treat the lesion with hemiarthroplasty or THA. Secondary outcomes included method of fixation of the femoral/acetabular components and head type utilized. RESULTS: A total of 93 members (30.0%) of the MSTS completed the survey. Across all clinical vignettes, 73.3% (p < 0.001) of the responses were in favor of hemiarthroplasty; however, there was no significant difference between hemiarthroplasty and THA in Cases 1 & 2 (p = 0.08, p = 0.6, respectively); the cases representing younger patients with a more favorable histologic diagnosis. When THA was selected the majority of respondents preferred hybrid or cementless fixation construct (56.1% and 27.0%, respectively, p < 0.001). When hemiarthroplasty was selected respondents selected a cemented, bipolar construct (86.4% and 64.2%, respectively, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: When treating metastatic lesions of the femoral head and neck orthopaedic oncologists do not agree on reconstructing with THA versus hemiarthroplasty for patients with younger age and favorable histology. This investigation highlights the controversy of this clinical decision and indicates the need for a collaborative prospective trial among this specific patient population in order to determine the optimal treatment method.